It would be useful if the AI could also highlight where those standards are not being followed. Usually, you create a design, hand it over to the client, and then they start changing fonts, spacing, or other elements, and everything gradually falls apart.
Manually finding those inconsistencies takes a lot of time. An automated system that could detect and flag such issues would be fantastic.
PH 用户
“Design DNA” is a useful way to package what builders often struggle to describe. Colors and type are helpful, but the reasoning behind decisions is the really valuable part. Can it compare multiple reference sites and synthesize a direction?
我建了Taste Lab，因为反复撞墙：跟Claude说“照那个网站的风格做这个”，结果做出来的东西技术上接近，但明显不是那个味儿。比例不对，间距看着随意。
问题不在能力，而在于我给智能体的语言。Token 说了设计是什么，但Taste加上了为什么：那些解释每个具体决定的取舍。
这个流程彻底禁止“简洁现代”之类的说法。如果一个设计原则没看过这个具体网站也能写出来，那就删掉。
我很想知道你第一个拿去测的是哪个网站！
Manually finding those inconsistencies takes a lot of time. An automated system that could detect and flag such issues would be fantastic.