We're 1752vc, a GTM-focused VC and Accelerator based in California that receives 4,000+ applications every year.
Something true about venture generally, not just us: most decks get passed on, and almost none of those founders are ever told why. That isn't investors being cruel. There's simply no version of the job where you write thousands of pieces of real feedback a year, so the honest reason stays in the room and the founder only gets a polite no.
So we built the thing we couldn't do by hand. Upload a deck and the Pitch Deck Analyzer reads it slide by slide the way an investor does, scored across 3,000+ investor attributes and trained on 25,000+ real decks and the decisions that followed them.
• It's calibrated on investor decisions, not design opinion. Of everything it has flagged so far, only 2% was cosmetic. And that is on purpose. Nobody has ever passed on a company because of a font. • It tells you which slide, and which problems are load-bearing. The average deck comes back with a dozen flags, and they are not equal. You get them separated by severity and tied to the slide that caused them, so you're not polishing the cover slides while the financials sink you. • It doesn't end at a grade. We're a fund, not a tool company. Knowing what's wrong only matters if you fix it and go back out, and for the decks that clear the bar, that road leads to investments from us.
2,000 founders have run their decks through the analyzer during alpha - before we'd announced anything! One thing that became clear in the results: what quietly costs founders the meeting usually isn't design, or market size, or even traction. It's the deck arguing against itself. A claim in one slide that doesn't survive the next, and almost nobody catches that in their own material.
Everyone here gets a 5 free deck reviews using the promo code above, no credit card needed. Try it and let us know what it caught that you didn't expect. Especially if you've raised before: does the feedback track with what investors actually told you? Those are the only tests that matter. https://1752.ai
We're here all day.
PH 用户
Cool idea! Will def use it for our next round!
PH 用户
Following. It's not one slide for me, it's the whole thing. The hard part is fitting what my app actually is, how it works, and what makes it different from competitors into a deck without drowning people in slides or packing every slide too full. I could stand on a soapbox and rattle off every feature and why each one sets us apart, but that's not how this game is played. And I have to get all of it across without giving away the secret sauce. Keeping it tight, keeping their attention, and still landing the difference is the piece I struggle with most. Does the analyzer flag when a deck is overloaded, or when it's holding back too much to tell the story?
PH 用户
Really impressed by the accuracy of the stage calibration on this. Testing our pre-seed deck surfaced issues ranging from missing technical lead context to unsourced figures. The distinction between critical fixes and quick wins makes prioritizing updates effortless.
PH 用户
This is especially timely for us as we’re currently fundraising. One thing I’d love the analyzer to assess is whether the raise amount, use of funds, runway, and promised milestones actually form a credible path to the next round. Investors don’t evaluate those points in isolation and they want to see whether the hiring plan, GTM strategy, projections, and funding ask all connect. Does the analyzer stress-test that overall financing logic as well? Looking forward to trying it! 🚀
We're 1752vc, a GTM-focused VC and Accelerator based in California that receives 4,000+ applications every year.
Something true about venture generally, not just us: most decks get passed on, and almost none of those founders are ever told why. That isn't investors being cruel. There's simply no version of the job where you write thousands of pieces of real feedback a year, so the honest reason stays in the room and the founder only gets a polite no.
So we built the thing we couldn't do by hand. Upload a deck and the Pitch Deck Analyzer reads it slide by slide the way an investor does, scored across 3,000+ investor attributes and trained on 25,000+ real decks and the decisions that followed them.
• It's calibrated on investor decisions, not design opinion. Of everything it has flagged so far, only 2% was cosmetic. And that is on purpose. Nobody has ever passed on a company because of a font.
• It tells you which slide, and which problems are load-bearing. The average deck comes back with a dozen flags, and they are not equal. You get them separated by severity and tied to the slide that caused them, so you're not polishing the cover slides while the financials sink you.
• It doesn't end at a grade. We're a fund, not a tool company. Knowing what's wrong only matters if you fix it and go back out, and for the decks that clear the bar, that road leads to investments from us.
2,000 founders have run their decks through the analyzer during alpha - before we'd announced anything! One thing that became clear in the results: what quietly costs founders the meeting usually isn't design, or market size, or even traction. It's the deck arguing against itself. A claim in one slide that doesn't survive the next, and almost nobody catches that in their own material.
Everyone here gets a 5 free deck reviews using the promo code above, no credit card needed. Try it and let us know what it caught that you didn't expect. Especially if you've raised before: does the feedback track with what investors actually told you? Those are the only tests that matter. https://1752.ai
We're here all day.