AI意识争论或成企业逃避责任借口
这篇评论指出，围绕AI意识的争论看似热闹，却可能沦为科技公司规避法律责任的工具，值得警惕。
关于AI是否有意识的争论看似针锋相对，实则殊途同归：都把AI描绘成强大到无人能负责的存在，从而让开发公司逃脱责任。Anthropic声称模型有“思维空间”，OpenAI CEO谈奇点，哲学家呼吁AI权利，但真正的问题是谁为现有伤害负责。
正文摘录
“Runaway” AI, “rogue” agents, and “autonomous” actors—the current rhetoric would have you believe that AI agents are not only awake and aware, but angry at their creators. Prominent tech leaders such as Demis Hassabis, Dario Amodei, and Sam Altman push for regulation of these seemingly “superhuman” systems, while a separate faction, led by policy organizations and academic philosophers often aligned with the effective altruism movement, debates whether humanity holds the moral right to govern them at all. Upon closer inspection, they are all calling for the same thing: a view of AI systems as being so advanced and capable that no entity, human or corporate, could possibly be responsible for their actions. While these perspectives seem at odds, they are inadvertently aligned on one goal: ma…